<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Installing RHEL 5 using the VMware Paravirtualized SCSI driver (pvscsi)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.torkwrench.com/2010/01/06/installing-rhel-5-using-the-vmware-paravirtualized-scsi-driver-pvscsi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.torkwrench.com/2010/01/06/installing-rhel-5-using-the-vmware-paravirtualized-scsi-driver-pvscsi/</link>
	<description>Things I learnt today, working on IBM Lotus Web Content Management.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:31:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.torkwrench.com/2010/01/06/installing-rhel-5-using-the-vmware-paravirtualized-scsi-driver-pvscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-1978</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkwrench.com/?p=184#comment-1978</guid>
		<description>Hey Sebastian, 

Yeah that is to be expected. You need to relink the pvscsi kernel modules back to the new kernel that you&#039;ve installed. Running the vmware-config-tools.pl script should do it for you.

Cheers,

Graham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sebastian, </p>
<p>Yeah that is to be expected. You need to relink the pvscsi kernel modules back to the new kernel that you&#8217;ve installed. Running the vmware-config-tools.pl script should do it for you.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Graham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.torkwrench.com/2010/01/06/installing-rhel-5-using-the-vmware-paravirtualized-scsi-driver-pvscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-1970</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkwrench.com/?p=184#comment-1970</guid>
		<description>Graham, it seems that whenever you upgrade the kernel you lose the paravirtualized driver, don&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham, it seems that whenever you upgrade the kernel you lose the paravirtualized driver, don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.torkwrench.com/2010/01/06/installing-rhel-5-using-the-vmware-paravirtualized-scsi-driver-pvscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-1857</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 11:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkwrench.com/?p=184#comment-1857</guid>
		<description>Hey Maurizio,

I&#039;m not sure if Redhat Enterprise is available to download, but the free version of it, CentOS is &lt;a href=&quot;http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/centos/5.5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.5-i386-netinstall.iso&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here &lt;/a&gt;. Keep in mind that this is just the boot cd, you will need to expose the rest of the install tree on a NFS/FTP/WWW server so your guest vm can get at it.  

Cheers,

Graham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Maurizio,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if Redhat Enterprise is available to download, but the free version of it, CentOS is <a href="http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/centos/5.5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.5-i386-netinstall.iso" rel="nofollow">here </a>. Keep in mind that this is just the boot cd, you will need to expose the rest of the install tree on a NFS/FTP/WWW server so your guest vm can get at it.  </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Graham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurizio Marini</title>
		<link>http://www.torkwrench.com/2010/01/06/installing-rhel-5-using-the-vmware-paravirtualized-scsi-driver-pvscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurizio Marini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 08:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkwrench.com/?p=184#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>Is available this iso somewhere to download?

tia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is available this iso somewhere to download?</p>
<p>tia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeremyinNC</title>
		<link>http://www.torkwrench.com/2010/01/06/installing-rhel-5-using-the-vmware-paravirtualized-scsi-driver-pvscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>JeremyinNC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkwrench.com/?p=184#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>Nice. On the Windows side there are massive gains if you&#039;re VMs are doing a lot of IO. I ran an interesting test the other day - I took a Server 2008R2 x64 machine (laptop, I&#039;m lazy and desktops are heavy but stay with me)  and exported an NFS share using the built in NFS server. Then I mounted it as a volume on our ESX host, moved a VM to it and ran SQLIO tests *on the VM*.  I got 2.6k IOPS (SSD disk).

Then I ran the exact same test locally on the laptop. 2.7k IOPS. Obviously it&#039;s limited by the laptop&#039;s crappy controller but it also tells me that even on a relatively high IO VM you&#039;re not paying a lot for the hypervisor.

This is using NFS  as the data protocol obviously (dual 1gig NICs to the storage switch from the ESX host, single 1gig on the laptop but that didn&#039;t appear to be a bottleneck).

Trying to get our Ubuntu VMs to boot off the paravirtual devices is not fun :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. On the Windows side there are massive gains if you&#8217;re VMs are doing a lot of IO. I ran an interesting test the other day &#8211; I took a Server 2008R2 x64 machine (laptop, I&#8217;m lazy and desktops are heavy but stay with me)  and exported an NFS share using the built in NFS server. Then I mounted it as a volume on our ESX host, moved a VM to it and ran SQLIO tests *on the VM*.  I got 2.6k IOPS (SSD disk).</p>
<p>Then I ran the exact same test locally on the laptop. 2.7k IOPS. Obviously it&#8217;s limited by the laptop&#8217;s crappy controller but it also tells me that even on a relatively high IO VM you&#8217;re not paying a lot for the hypervisor.</p>
<p>This is using NFS  as the data protocol obviously (dual 1gig NICs to the storage switch from the ESX host, single 1gig on the laptop but that didn&#8217;t appear to be a bottleneck).</p>
<p>Trying to get our Ubuntu VMs to boot off the paravirtual devices is not fun <img src='http://www.torkwrench.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
